Lizet Morlote- Leon
Carlos Albizu University
Mentor: Fina Campa
Chapter of sixteen
Group Remedy: Ancestor and Cousins
During the 1960s and 1970s, the encounter group phenomenon, a heady, powerful social motion, swept throughout the nation. There are several reasons the contemporary group therapist really should have, at the very least, several passing understanding of them. Initial, the proper teaching of the group therapist must contain some personal group experience. Secondly, the form of contemporary group therapy continues to be vastly motivated by the encounter group. Last but not least, the face group or at least the traditions from which this emerged continues to be responsible for growing the best, and the most superior, small group study technology. Typical encounter groupings have largely come and gone nevertheless they have had a substantial influence how group therapy has developed – both in the large multi-headed self-help movement and the more traditional psychiatric/psychological environment. Let us analyze some remnants of the encounter group motion. The self-help group movements is an enormously increasing field which in turn merits discussion because its goals in many ways are seite an seite to the goals of group therapy. Self-help groups are present for the explicit purpose of offering emotional support: that they help associates deal with a psychological issue, a physical health issues, a significant exterior stress, or with a stigmatized status in society (for example becoming short, obese, gay, and widowed). Come across group can be described as rough, inexact generic term that has a great selection of forms. Consider some of its many aliases: human relationships groups, training groups, T-groups, sensitivity groupings, personal progress groups, convention groups, human potential groups, sensory understanding groups, basic encounter groups, experiential teams, and so on. Although the nominal plumage is dazzling in its diversity, all these organizations have a number of common denominators. The organizations range in proportion from ten to twenty members - large enough to encourage face-to-face interaction, yet small enough to permit almost all members to interact. The groups are often time-limited, often compressed in hours or perhaps days. That they focus into a large extent around the here-and-now; that they transcend manners and motivate the doffing of traditional social facades. Finally, these kinds of groups value interpersonal trustworthiness, exploration, confrontation, heightened psychological expressiveness, and self-disclosure. The goals of a group are often vague. At times they pressure merely the provision of the experience - joy, entertainment, being switched on; but often they implicitly or explicitly strive for a lot of change —- in patterns, in attitudes, in values, in life style, in self-actualization; or in one's romantic relationship to others, towards the environment, to one's personal body. The participants aren't generally tagged " people; ” the knowledge is considered not really therapy although " expansion. ” ANTECEDENTS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE FACE GROUP
The term encounter group for an experiential group was coined by Carl Rogers in the mid-1960s. The most common term before then was T-group (" T” pertaining to training in human being relations). The first T-group, the primitive experiential group, was held in 1946. The State of Connecticut acquired passed a good Employment Practices Act and asked Kurt Lewin, a prominent social psychologist, to teach leaders who could package effectively with tensions between groups and so help to change the racial behaviour of the public. Kurt Lewin organized a workshop that consisted of small groups of ten members each. These teams were led in the classic manner of the morning; they were basically discussion groups and analyzed ‘back home' problems provided by the group members. Reviews
Feedback, a term borrowed from electric engineering, was first applied to the behavioral sciences by Lewin (it is no accident that he was educating at Meters. I. Big t. at the time). The early teachers considered that the...